Back in the 90′s motorola corp started a small company called Iridium. They built ANALOG satellites 77 of them. Then they went bankrupt. the satellites were not allowed to be operated according to the bankruptcy. these were supposedly put onto orbit so you could use analog communications from any location on the earth. they are sitting up there, under govt. control, not being used??? RIIIIGHT!!!

All somebody has to do is think of the applications of having a broad based spread spectrum analog airway free of ALL communication clutter, aligned with these satellites, and you’ll come to the conclusion, THAT THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOW PLACE TO HIDE. that is there is no place to hide, be alone or do anything without being named ONCE YOU TAKE THE CHIP IMPLANT!

beware america, beware world.

God bless.

Don’t fight it: defeat it, by screwing with it to the point that any 5 y.o can outsmart it. Come on now, is this America or not? You want to be American, then come up with ten thousand ways to make this technology FAIL.

Gang up against it. With extreme prejudice!

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.05/rfid.html

Fuck you and your fucking ID chips!

recently google have come right out and said they are going to use two way cameras in their software in order to see who is in your living room with you!!!

sorry i cant source the link , but will post it when or if I find it.

We are stocking up on dvd box sets to watch on our ordinary tv and plan to get rid of all devices that they can track us through( not that we are doing anything illegal its just so creepy that they can not only see and hear you in your own home , but also that your own thoughts are no longer safe or private.,that means going back to snail mail , dumping the mobiles , tvs and game consoles and going backwards . the only other thing i can think of is to buy a lap top and never use it in the same place twice, but still with the new blasphemy laws hate crime and thought crime eating up all our free speech .

did you know that the new phone taps work as easily as sitting outside a cafe in a car typing a code into your mobile and then say you are tailing a subject and wish to know what they are saying ….by typing in this code all mobiles in the vicinity of your subject ( like say a coffee shop or restaurant) become a transmitter of conversations. Your phone doesnt even have to be switched on to be eavesdropped on. If you are wise enough to this , and remove your battery ( the only way to avoid this phone tapping) but still continue your conversation, the person at the table next to you will still pick up on their phone what you are saying and hey presto , your mind has been hacked.

Its scarey and intimidating , i would rather do without tv and a phone than have my every move tracked. Its bad enough that every phonecall is recorded and email or sms kept.

totalitarian control, can only be achieved if we give in and continue to use the objects they use to control us.

I will find it tough to let go of my computer though . what is every one else planning to do to cope with this alarming situation?

“QUOTE”
Wiley InterScience HOME
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
HELP
Home / Chemistry / Biochemistry

Biopolymers
See Also:

Peptide Science
Volume 28 Issue 1, Pages 69 – 79
Published Online: 1 Feb 2004

Copyright © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company

Get Sample Copy
Recommend to Your Librarian
Save journal to My Profile
Set E-Mail Alert
Email this page
Print this page
RSS web feed (What is RSS?)

Save Article to My Profile Download Citation

Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 583K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Article
Conformational behavior of cyclic CCK-related peptides determined by 400-MHz 1H-nmr: Relationships with affinity and selectivity for brain receptors
P. Roy, B. Charpentier, C. Durieux, A. Dor, B. P. Roques
Départment de Chimie Organique, U 266 INSERM, UA 498 CNRS, Faculté de Pharmacie, 4, Avenue de l’Observatoire, 75006 Paris, France

Abstract
The conformational study of a homogenous series of cyclic analogues of CCK8, selective for central receptors, such as Boc- [bar X-Tyr(SO3H)-Nle-D-Lys ]-Trp-Nle-Asp-Phe-NH2, where X = L-Glu, D-Glu, or -D-Glu, was performed by 400-MHz 1H-nmr. The regular increase in affinity for central receptors when going from [L-Glu] to [-D-Glu] is correlated to (a) an enhancement in internal flexibility of the cyclic moiety, (b) an external orientation of the tyrosine side chain, and (c) a restructuring of the C-terminal part of the peptide. All these results could permit a modeling of biologically active conformation of CCK8 for both receptors types to be performed.

——————————————————————————–
Received: 26 July 1988; Accepted: 18 August 1988

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1002/bip.360280110 About DOI
Related Articles

To lay-people like me, every little bit helps. That being said, there’s something that bugs me about all this.

When they(in America anyway, I don’t know how it is everywhere else)started to broadcast Digital Radio stations, there wasn’t any fuss over ‘bandwidth’ or ‘interferance’ or anything else. I’ve lived in Boston all my life. There are a few am and fm stations that are a big pain in the ass to dial in on an old school radio. One day I was in a friends car and I’m like ‘what the hell is this?’…digital radio, la di da, isn’t that nice. And it was nice. And it is nice.

All I’m saying is if they didn’t need to wipe all the analog radio stations off the dial to start broadcasting in digital years ago, and all the old analog stations are still up and running, then why were all the analog tv stations forced to kill all their analog signals even though it’s painfully obvious that doing so was totally unnecessary for the opperation of the Digital signal.

The whole thing doesn’t pass the smell test. It can’t ONLY be about money.

DTV was created years back for the reasons:
Greed and Fear.
It had nothing to do with RFID tags.

You have to understand that terrestrial broadcast television was a “Sacred Cow” for years in this country.
It’s industry group, the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) had enormous clout — it still does!

But in the years prior to the mid 1980′s, terrestrial broadcast had seen it’s spectrum yanked for all sorts of things.
CH-37 went to deep space telemetry
CH-70 thru 83 went to create the initial analog cellular bands.

So why digital TV?
I believe the thinking was (on the part of the broadcasters) that they could “protect” their spectrum by offering digital television IN ADDITION to analog television.
In effect, doubling their spectrum use. (Recall that even as late at the mid-80′s) there was plenty of unused TV broadcast spectrum outside the Top-50 markets or so..)
I also feel the broadcaster’s approach and thinking was flawed from the beginning, but I’m not sure what they could have done differently to protect their industry.
(Maybe take a larger ownership share in the studios, or develop much better programming??) But I digress…..

Along the way, the Congress got wise to the money that could be earned via Spectrum Auctions (courtesy of the Cell/PCS and Paging auctions).
That started the push to do a “switch” to digital with the analog spectrum returned, vs. the dual-format originally envisioned by the broadcasters.
And truth be told — I don’t think the terrestrial broadcasters really wanted HDTV anyway. But they certainly wouldn’t have minded a regulatory environment that encumbered (and thus “protected”) the spectrum from being used for other services.

Fast forward: TV spectrum (digital) continues to be under fire. The FCC has recently allowed “white space” devices to utilize unused TV spectrum.
It has authorized ultra-wideband devices, such as thru-wall imagers and ground-penetrating radars (all of which operate in portions of the TV spectrum.)
It has allowed continued competition via cable, satellite and the Internet.

The result:
Terrestrial broadcasters elect to used multi-channel (multiple programming) standard definition digital instead of pumping out high definition.
—which was the whole purpose of this 20-year+ effort in the first place!!

In other words, instead of spitting out a single HD program, they use their TV channel to send out multiple, lower-quality, programming.
I guess the thinking is: compete on quantity, not quality. (Note: Still unwilling, or unable, to produce better programming!?)

If you also consider that TV stations had to spend a fortune (that they didn’t have!) to construct their digital facilites (new transmitter, new microwave STL facilities, new digital live-eye trucks, studio cameras, switchers, even new towers and transmitters in some cases!!), they weren’t making any money during the transition either! Advertisers weren’t paying double to have their commercials broadcasted in both analog and digital.

Outside the top-20 or so markets, it was impossible to charge for this. Advertisers simply wouldn’t pay it.
And for the truly rural markets — they were screwed.

But it’s from their own doing in my opinion — so I really don’t feel that bad for them.
Terrestrial broadcast television is the horse & buggy of our generation.
I don’t see the need for the government to prop them up.

What is it? Like 85% of folks get their programming from satellite or cable anyway?
(Ignori ng the fact that some cable operators still get their DTV feeds over the air.)

And even then, I think I’d prefer to curl up with a nice DVD movie (or Internet download), than watch the drivel and commercial content of over-the-air.

This isn’t good to ‘keep track of criminals’ for this simple reason…a ‘criminal’ is whoever the government says it is. Today it’ll be a murderer. Tomorrow it will be us ‘thought criminals’ with the nerve to dialoge with each other here and on other sites throughout the web. China is a modern-day ‘Exhibit-A’ of this:(

We are Free. We are NOT a number.