<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Questions Regarding The Fort Hood Massacre &#8211; Chuck Baldwin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dprogram.net/2009/11/21/questions-regarding-the-fort-hood-massacre-chuck-baldwin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dprogram.net/2009/11/21/questions-regarding-the-fort-hood-massacre-chuck-baldwin/</link>
	<description>Countering Propaganda</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 06:45:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://dprogram.net/2009/11/21/questions-regarding-the-fort-hood-massacre-chuck-baldwin/#comment-24389</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dprogram.net/?p=24818#comment-24389</guid>
		<description>this guy was another cia mind controll victum, look where he came from, look at what his profession was, notice how non of the stories jive. this was another attempt at the zionist jews spreading hate of muslims, and they don&#039;t care who or how many they have to kill to spread thier fear and chaos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this guy was another cia mind controll victum, look where he came from, look at what his profession was, notice how non of the stories jive. this was another attempt at the zionist jews spreading hate of muslims, and they don&#8217;t care who or how many they have to kill to spread thier fear and chaos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aggressionmanagement</title>
		<link>http://dprogram.net/2009/11/21/questions-regarding-the-fort-hood-massacre-chuck-baldwin/#comment-24388</link>
		<dc:creator>aggressionmanagement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dprogram.net/?p=24818#comment-24388</guid>
		<description>LEARN HOW TO PREVENT FUTURE NIDAL HASANS

The dilemma caused by the shooting at Fort Hood by Major Hasan exemplifies how each of our programs have failed us. When supervisors, counselors and task forces members rely on subjective references of culture and mental illness, observers miss the signs specific to aggression referenced in post analysis.  When observers focus specifically on aggressive behavior, the objective and culturally neutral signs of “aggression” standout, providing the opportunity to prevent these violent encounters.

Major Hasan was under surveillance by two Terrorist Task Forces, one with Department of Defense oversight and the other with FBI oversight.  So why wasn’t he stopped?

The use of subjective/qualitative indicators, prone to stereotype individuals by culture or religion; versus quantitative indicators and the use of mental health references know to mislead and misconstrue, fails us repeatedly in our attempts to prevent acts of violence. Only when we use the specificity of “aggression” and its objective, culturally neutral indicators can we get-out-in-front of these acts of aggression and prevent them. Why are current systems uses on campus failing us?

The answer is quite simple – The military does not have an objective and culturally neutral system that collects information and evaluates it to determine the degree (or level) of aggression an individual is displaying, nor has it people who have a clear responsibility to observe and report this information. Learn more about the problem and the solution by reading our Blog: http://Blog.AggressionManagement.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LEARN HOW TO PREVENT FUTURE NIDAL HASANS</p>
<p>The dilemma caused by the shooting at Fort Hood by Major Hasan exemplifies how each of our programs have failed us. When supervisors, counselors and task forces members rely on subjective references of culture and mental illness, observers miss the signs specific to aggression referenced in post analysis.  When observers focus specifically on aggressive behavior, the objective and culturally neutral signs of “aggression” standout, providing the opportunity to prevent these violent encounters.</p>
<p>Major Hasan was under surveillance by two Terrorist Task Forces, one with Department of Defense oversight and the other with FBI oversight.  So why wasn’t he stopped?</p>
<p>The use of subjective/qualitative indicators, prone to stereotype individuals by culture or religion; versus quantitative indicators and the use of mental health references know to mislead and misconstrue, fails us repeatedly in our attempts to prevent acts of violence. Only when we use the specificity of “aggression” and its objective, culturally neutral indicators can we get-out-in-front of these acts of aggression and prevent them. Why are current systems uses on campus failing us?</p>
<p>The answer is quite simple – The military does not have an objective and culturally neutral system that collects information and evaluates it to determine the degree (or level) of aggression an individual is displaying, nor has it people who have a clear responsibility to observe and report this information. Learn more about the problem and the solution by reading our Blog: <a href="http://Blog.AggressionManagement.com" rel="nofollow">http://Blog.AggressionManagement.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Gjelten</title>
		<link>http://dprogram.net/2009/11/21/questions-regarding-the-fort-hood-massacre-chuck-baldwin/#comment-24387</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Gjelten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dprogram.net/?p=24818#comment-24387</guid>
		<description>In the interests of truth, here&#039;s my actual quote:

GJELTEN: You know, you referred to the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. There’s - almost seems to be a phenomenon that you could maybe call a pre-traumatic stress disorder. There have been a lot suicides in the Army, many more as a result of these wars than in previous years. Interestingly enough, as many soldiers have killed themselves before they were due to be deployed as after. Thirty-five percent of the suicides are pre-deployment, 35 percent are post-deployment. So there seems to be an issue here of expectation of what you are getting into.



That’s from the transcript. The reference to “pre-traumatic stress disorder” was not to Hasan but to the high pre-deployment suicide rate in the Army. Perhaps you find that something to laugh about. I do not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the interests of truth, here&#8217;s my actual quote:</p>
<p>GJELTEN: You know, you referred to the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. There’s &#8211; almost seems to be a phenomenon that you could maybe call a pre-traumatic stress disorder. There have been a lot suicides in the Army, many more as a result of these wars than in previous years. Interestingly enough, as many soldiers have killed themselves before they were due to be deployed as after. Thirty-five percent of the suicides are pre-deployment, 35 percent are post-deployment. So there seems to be an issue here of expectation of what you are getting into.</p>
<p>That’s from the transcript. The reference to “pre-traumatic stress disorder” was not to Hasan but to the high pre-deployment suicide rate in the Army. Perhaps you find that something to laugh about. I do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

