Video: George Soros Conspires with United Nations to Kill Second Amendment

March 15th, 2010

(KurtNimmo) – In the video below, we learn that Rebecca Peters, director of of the International Action Network on Small Arms (IANSA), is working with the United Nations and governments around the world to grab guns. Peters and IANSA are funded by the globalist George Soros.

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
March 15, 2010

“Rebecca Peters was Chair of the National Coalition for Gun Control, which campaigned to tighten Australia’s gun laws in the 1990s,” writes the Umut Foundation, an organization dedicated to “Individual Disarmament” in “harmony” with the European Union. “Her research and advocacy helped bring about sweeping changes, including uniform gun laws across the eight states, a ban on semiautomatic rifles and shotguns, and a year-long buyback that destroyed nearly 700,000 weapons. Among the awards she received was the 1996 Australian Human Rights Medal, her country’s highest human rights honor.”

Prior to working with IANSA, Peters worked for Soros’ Open Society Institute.

Soros has dedicated a large percentage of his income gained from manipulating international stock and currency markets to push for gun control. He exploits the usual “liberal” useful idiots to push his gun-grabbing agenda.

“Directly and through his organization Open Society Institute (OSI), he has funneled cash to various anti-gun groups, such as the Tides Foundation, the HELP Network and SAFE Colorado. He and seven rich friends founded their own political committee — Campaign for a Progressive Future — and spent $2 million on political activities in 2000, including providing the prime financial backing for the Million Mom March. OSI has supported UN efforts to create international gun control regulations and has singled out the United States for failing to go along with the international gun-prohibitionists,” notes the NRA.

“The bottom line is that international gun banners want every gun — every single gun worldwide — to be under U.N. and government control,” notes Wayne LaPierre of the NRA. “And that includes your rifle, your shotgun, your handgun, and even family heirlooms that have been handed down from generation to generation.”

As noted by Lou Dobbs before he was forced out of CNN (see video below), the Obama administration stands behind CIFTA, the Inter-American Convention Against Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms. Obama and crew are pushing this treaty under the pretense it will disarm drug cartels and criminals.

Every aspect of the treaty, however, introduces major required gun controls, most of which will affect average citizens and nullify the Second Amendment.

In 2009, Obama told Mexican President Felipe Calderon he would do everything in his power to get the U.S. Senate to pass the treaty. Under the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, international legal obligations are superior rank to national law. If the CIFTA treaty is ratified, and not having defined the exceptions to its many requirements within our Constitution, it would usurp U.S. sovereignty and open the door to additional legislation to support its application in U.S. law.

“Obviously, the United Nations, from its very inception, has been one of the world’s most ardent gun control proponents. As anyone who has ever driven by the U.N. building in New York City knows, a huge statue of an American-made revolver with its barrel twisted in the shape of a pretzel greets every visitor. The CIFTA treaty is one of the U.N.’s pet projects in order to achieve this long-held ambition,” writes Chuck Baldwin.

In October of last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told the United Nations the U.S. would support negotiations of an Arms Trade Treaty to regulate international gun trafficking. Two weeks earlier, the U.S. joined a nearly unanimous 153-1 U.N. vote to adopt a resolution setting out a timetable on the proposed Arms Trade Treaty, including a U.N. conference to produce a final accord in 2012.

“Over the past decade, the UN has waged a campaign to undermine gun rights protected by the Second Amendment of the US Constitution,” Rep. Ron Paul wrote in 2003. “Secretary Annan is not the only globalist calling for international controls on firearms. For example, some world leaders, including French President Jacques Chirac, have called for a global tax on firearms. Meanwhile, the UN Security Council’s ‘Report of the Group of Governmental Experts on Small Arms’ calls for a comprehensive program of worldwide gun control and praises the restrictive gun polices of Red China and France!”

Soros, the United Nations, and the globalists are diligently working behind the scenes to dismantle the Second Amendment and grab your guns under international treaty. As should be expected, the corporate media — with the exception of Lou Dobbs, who was unceremoniously bounced earlier this year — is not covering this important issue.

Source: Prison Planet

Post to Twitter Post to Facebook Send Gmail Post to LinkedIn Post to MySpace

No related posts.

3 Responses to “Video: George Soros Conspires with United Nations to Kill Second Amendment”

  1. WOLF Says:

    DICK ACT of 1902… CAN’T BE REPEALED (GUN CONTROL FORBIDDEN) – Protection Against Tyrannical Government
    http://www.knowthelies.com/?q=node/3949
    The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-called gun-control laws. It also divides the militia into three distinct and separate entities.

    ** SPREAD THIS TO EVERYONE **

    The three classes H.R. 11654 provides for are the organized militia, henceforth known as the National Guard of the State, Territory and District of Columbia, the unorganized militia and the regular army. The militia encompasses every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 45. All members of the unorganized militia have the absolute personal right and 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms of any type, and as many as they can afford to buy.

    The Dick Act of 1902 cannot be repealed; to do so would violate bills of attainder and ex post facto laws which would be yet another gross violation of the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The President of the United States has zero authority without violating the Constitution to call the National Guard to serve outside of their State borders.

    The National Guard Militia can only be required by the National Government for limited purposes specified in the Constitution (to uphold the laws of the Union; to suppress insurrection and repel invasion). These are the only purposes for which the General Government can call upon the National Guard.

  2. Terry Says:

    Peters showed up in Oz two years before the gun control push in 1984. She was a U.S. citizen. She started working with the gun control issue all though to 1997 (after Port Arthur Massacre) and went back to the U.S. to work with Soros as an Austraian citizen. Her work in Oz was finished.

    While in Oz she had unlimited access to politicians, legal bodies and media. She admitted that her father had worked with the State Department, other people figured that was a cover story.

    Leading up to the Port Arthur Massacre, the first three gun massacres in Oz have suspect issues, but were perpetrated by ‘lone gunmen’. Although the push was on and the legislation was written, those massacres failed to generate the shock and awe necessary to implement the gun control agenda. Then the Port Arthur Massacre – the Port Arthur Massacre was a highly orchestrated psy-op involving many different intelligence agencies. The alleged perpetrator was a mentally handicapped fellow with a psychological age of 11 and a moron, his IQ places him in the lower 2% of the population.

    Enough evidence has surfaced regarding the Port Arthur Massacre that it is patently clear that Martin Bryant did not commit the massacre. There is objective evidence available to clear him. He never got a trial. His first attorney was removed when Bryant pleaded ‘not guilty’. His second attorney was a known crook who worked for the police. He has since been disbarred for dishonesty with his clients. That attoryney managed, after 6 months of solitary confinement, to get Bryant to plead guilty.

    The Port Arthur Massacre was Austraia’s version of a 9-11 psy-op. Peters has now moved on with all her international contacts and has been and is presently working on a disarmament agenda for the U.S. – Good luck.

  3. Wibeford Says:

    The only “war” is on Your RIGHTS, not Terror. In Jan. 2005 there was a PANIC due to a rumor that Chinese with a NUKE had crossed the Mexican border and were headed to blow up Boston. The border is STILL wide open ……
    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/02/26/60minutes/main4831806.shtml
    Above is a transcript from March 2nd (rerun on June 21) 60 MINUTES. In brief, the Government acknowledges that it has no control of the border. TONS of drugs and Millions of ILLEGALS enter this country. TONS of cash and TONS of weapons leave this country. They have no way of knowing how many “TERRORISTS” have crossed (IF there IS such a creature)
    TWO things were of major interest:
    (1) The Department of Homeland STUPIDITY acknowledges they have no control – therefore, HOW are they going to protect you from TERRORISTS, if they cannot stop gangbangers.
    (2) The “head” of the Department of Homeland STUPIDITY (and others) tries to blame your RIGHT to keep and bear ARMS for the weapons going south. The only trouble is …….. they showed and talked of MISSILES, HAND GRENADES, BELT FED MACHINES GUNS. Those are weapons STOLEN FROM THE AMERICAN MILITARY. They are not coming from the SEMI-auto Civilian world! They are direct from your Military’s ARMORIES. Not only can your Government NOT PROTECT the borders …. and YOU. The Government CANNOT HANG ON TO IT’S OWN WEAPONS!!!
    And then they try to use THEIR failures to attack YOUR RIGHTS.
    You all need to go out and get MORE guns, because this government cannot protect you from ANYTHING. As a matter of fact, the police have NO “obligation” to protect individuals (You OR your FAMILY). Their purpose is to protect “society” (the government).
    Do not believe me? Go research it, it has been “upheld” in many court cases..

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.