‘Satire’ Article Quips ‘At Least 2 Billion Must Die’ to Save Earth

January 30th, 2012

COMMENT FROM ALEX JONES: Maybe The Onion should also make jokes about the Nazis mowing down Jewish women, as this group of avowed-Eugenicists, too, acted out murder in the name of saving the earth. Or what about the armed troops who burned down Ugandan villages and killed women & children last year on behalf of a British carbon trading company linked to the World Bank? That, too, was a trendy, cool environmental acts of genocide to save us from global warming.

(AaronDykes) – The prominent satire rag The Onion continues to bleed humor from the razor’s-edge of reality in an article that spoofs calls to kill off more than 2 billion people from the earth’s population ‘to save humanity.’

The January 26 piece, entitled Scientists: ‘Look, One-Third Of The Human Race Has to Die for Civilization to Be Sustainable, So How Do We Want to Do This?, so-closely reflects the real positions calling for coercive population control from prominent pseudo-scientists who’ve dominated policy, government posts and NGO organizations for the past hundred years that one can only laugh in horror.

It reads in part:

Saying there’s no way around it at this point, a coalition of scientists announced Thursday that one-third of the world population must die to prevent wide-scale depletion of the planet’s resources—and that humankind needs to figure out immediately how it wants to go about killing off more than 2 billion members of its species.

[...] “I’m just going to level with you—the earth’s carrying capacity will no longer be able to keep up with population growth, and civilization will end unless large swaths of human beings are killed, so the question is: How do we want to do this?” Cambridge University ecologist Dr. Edwin Peters said. “Do we want to give everyone a number and implement a death lottery system? Incinerate the nation’s children? Kill off an entire race of people? Give everyone a shotgun and let them sort it out themselves?”

But it’s no joke. It parallels a chilling reality of quotes from top globalists and eugenicists obsessed with leveling the earth’s population by any means necessary.

Whatever the intentions of The Onion, this form of humor only serves to condition the public to laugh off the sick agendas of the elite.

Many, including Lord Bertrand Russell and once President of the Royal Society of Science Sir Thomas Malthus, even advocated the return of the black plague.

For instance, Prince Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund, famously quipped that “If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.”

But he is only one of many. Sierra Club environmentalist and co-founder of Earth First, Dave Foreman, called ‘overpopulation the fundamental problem on earth today’, musing “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.” Meanwhile, the Club of Rome dubbed humanity itself as “the real enemy” in its 1991 publication The First Global Revolution.

Ted Turner, CNN founder and donor to United Nations’ population control programs of more than a billion dollars, stated his advocacy: “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

COERCIVE STERILIZATION

There’s no avoiding the reality that half the world’s progeny will have to be sterilized,” The Onion article goes on to read.

Dr. Eric Pianka, in a 2006 speech receiving an award from the Texas Academy of Sciences, drew applause from the crowd when he presented horrifying statements about the death of 90% of humanity by an airborne virus. He drew laughter, too, when advocating that everyone on earth be sterilized.

According to the transcript, he stated in part:

But there’s a solution that’s theoretically possible. I call it the Johnny Anti-Appleseed Solution. Instead of being cursed with our fertility, I would bless us with infertility. Now this could happen because male sperm counts are falling because of plastics and the estrogen [unintelligible] naturally. [...] We need to sterilize everybody on the Earth [laughter] and make the antidote freely available to anybody who’s willing to work for it.

Another passage from The Onion reads, “Thus far, humanity has been presented with a great variety of death options, among them, poisoning the world’s water supply.” Again, this closely mocks very real proposals.

Current White House science advisor John P. Holdren co-authored the textbook Ecoscience in 1977 with Population Bomb scaremonger Paul Ehrlich that controversially discussed adding a sterilant to the drinking water in order to curb population. A 1969 memo leaked from Planned Parenthood’s Vice President Frederick S. Jaffe, written secretly to (the Rockefeller’s) Population Council president also advocated “Fertility control agents in the water supply,” along with many other bizarre and draconian measures including the encouragement of homosexuality, in order to reduce the population.

Studies on infertility suggest that genetically-modified crops (GMOs), fluoridated water, vaccines (including cases of “accidental” contamination, as well as the Rockefeller Foundation development of an anti-fertility vaccine), products containing bisphenol-A (BPA) and other environmental toxins, too, are playing a role in the real life sterilizing of the population.

Jeffrey Smith Exposes Sterilization of Population Via GMO Foods on The Alex Jones Show 1/3

Alan Watt: BPA, Sterilization, Vaccines & Neo-Eugenics

FAMILY PLANNING AND MASS KILLINGS

In reality, hundreds of millions of dollars per year are spent by the largest of NGOs, including the Rockefeller, Gates, Ford, and Hewlett Foundations, as well as arms of the United Nations to push family planning, planned parenthood, and other health access programs in developing nations throughout the world. Whatever the merits of these initiatives on the surface, they serve in reality as a smokescreen and camel’s nose under the tent for coercive population control measures.

The Onion again bluntly reflects the decades of this reality. “Unfortunately, we are well past the point of controlling overpopulation through education, birth control, and the empowerment of women. In fact, we should probably kill 300 million women right off the bat.”

While police state China implemented strict one-child policies to contain its population, while encouraging abortions and infanticide, nations like India and Peru saw epidemics of forced sterilization under deceptive auspices to deal harshly with population growth. Other countries were bombarded with heavy handed propaganda, subsidized birth control and employed agents of the state to monitor the birth rates of its assigned families.

Under National Security Advisor and concurrent-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, the United States adopted an ongoing policy in 1973 that identified the reduction of population growth in the developing world as the highest priority. It further identified 13 key countries as being the most important to target reduction.

MAKING GENOCIDE A TRENDY & COOL JOKE

Underwater pioneer Jacques Costeau, voicing support for population reduction as a UNESCO courier, stated in 1991 that, “In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”

Is this statement more than a stone’s throw away from the mentality of the Nazis, who were also avowed Eugenicists? Were they, too justified in mowing down Jewish women at the edge of pits, if it was save the earth? No one today would laugh about the Holocaust, but here it is considered cool to laugh off proposals of genocide.

Nazis shooting Jews at the edge of a pit

What about the case last year where armed troops working on behalf of carbon trading firm tied to the World Bank burned villages in Uganda and killed women and children for the earth? They evicted these human beings and seized their land to help protect us all from “global warming,” now increasingly admitted to be a hoax threat.

The macabre, black humor of this article reflects this, too, citing the use of United Nations peacekeepers to kill millions and efforts to exterminate most of the population in Africa.

 

Sources confirmed that if a death solution is not in place by Mar. 31, the U.N., in the interest of preserving the human race, will mobilize its peacekeeping forces and gun down as many people as necessary.

“I don’t care how it happens, but a ton of Africans have to go, because by 2025, there’s no way that continent will be able to feed itself,” said Dr. Henry Craig of the Population Research Institute.

 

The mysterious new age monument, the Georgia Guidestones, chillingly recommends in its ten commandments to “Maintain humanity under 500,000 in perpetual balance with nature.” Again, this is perfectly in alignment with the article’s recommendation of the death of at least 2 billion in order to save the earth and its resources.

Playing up the notion of ‘voluntary’ mass suicide, The Onion article ends on a “hopeful” note:

“Hopefully, the people who remain on the planet will use the mass slaughter of their friends and loved ones as an incentive to be more responsible going forward,” he added.

The online version further includes a poll where readers can choose their preferred methods of death. They are again scripted to be dark, but bizarre and “humorous”:

Reading between the lines, someone is mocking the ignorance of the masses with regard to the real agendas at play, all while encouraging a playful participation in one’s own death.

Source: Infowars

2 Responses to “‘Satire’ Article Quips ‘At Least 2 Billion Must Die’ to Save Earth”

  1. PennyLane Says:

    I think this is all true, but the article also serves the purpose of educating a clueless public about such planning. It plants the idea into their heads that this exists. It also illuminates the true evil of the UN and elite planning. This is quite useful, really. The humor is very dark, but is a way of coping with such sociopathy among the powerful.

  2. Bifurcatio Says:

    I hate it that the ‘elite’ have taken global population under their wing as a problem to solve, but I do believe the world would be a more enthusiastic place with fewer people – such as the 3 billion that were here when I was born. If some natural virus popped up that randomly sterilized 50% of the world population for the next 50 years, making world population drop down steadily into the future, I’ll bet this would be looked upon as a breath of fresh air to many. I don’t want to kill anybody; I don’t even want to stop them from being born, just have their birth put off for awhile (a Buddhist/Hindu Anthropocentrifugaltransidentalist perspective). It’s discouraging to me that the ‘truth movement’ can’t come to grips with the population issue. There is one, whether the eugenicist elite offer their sick solutions or not. And it will be dealt with very shortly regardless of the sick elite or the ‘truth movement’.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.