(ULTruth) – When Underwriters Laboratories fired me for challenging the World Trade Center (WTC) report that it helped create with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), it said “there is no evidence” that any firm performed the required fire resistance testing of the materials used to build the Twin Towers. Of course, that was a lie.

With this experience in mind, I checked to see how many times the 9/11 Commission Report used the phrase “no evidence,” and noted in particular the times the Commission claimed to have “found no evidence” or that “no evidence was uncovered.” I discovered that the phrase “no evidence” appears an amazing 63 times. An example is the dubious statement — “There is no evidence to indicate that the FAA recognized Flight 77 as a hijacking until it crashed into the Pentagon (p 455).” Read the rest of this entry »

Newly released footage obtained from NIST by the International Center for 9/11 Studies shows firefighters describing secondary explosions shortly before the collapse of the twin towers. Read the rest of this entry »

Any theory that does not match experiment is wrong. It doesn’t matter what the computer models predict, how much funding is behind it, what the experts say, or what everyone “thinks”. Nothing can fool the laws of physics. Read the rest of this entry »

NIST caught lying about pools of molten steel found at the basement of Ground Zero, says no evidence or eye witnesses. This videos shows that NIST officials lied about it and they should be investigated. Read the rest of this entry »

(PaulWatson) – After filing a lawsuit that prompted NIST to release more than 3 terabytes of photographs and videos from their investigation into the collapse of the twin towers and WTC 7 on 9/11, the International Center for 9/11 Studies has obtained evidence that suggests NIST edited several videos of the collapse of Building 7 in order to hide evidence of a controlled implosion. Read the rest of this entry »

(Examiner) – Anders Björkman is a structural engineer from France who became an early member of Richard Gage’s AE911Truth. He had previously given speeches in his country to people whose children had seen footage of the Trade Towers’ destruction and were worried that buildings could collapse from the top down. He reassured these parents that this couldn’t happen and posted his presentation on his web site where it gradually developed.

Björkman became a formal critic of the “Progressive Collapse” or “Piledriver” theory promoted by Dr. Zdenek Bazant, a consultant for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in its work on 9-11. The Piledriver Theory basically posits that prolonged heating weakened the support columns of a single floor which caused the upper section to crush what was below it in a chain-reaction all the way to the bottom. Read More Here

(OpEdNews) – Progressives should press for exposure of the problems related to the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7. (An abbreviated set of seven of these problems are available at the 7problemswithbuilding7.info website.) Thus far, these problems have been mostly hidden from the public. Exposure could provide a rallying point for efforts to bring accountability and justice in America. It can bring clarity to the press for transparency in government, and it can expose corporate Machiavellian manipulations that have clearly gone on relative to Building 7′s collapse.

Transparency in government is badly needed, both within the Administration and in Congress. The happenings related to Building 7 make this abundantly clear. Read the rest of this entry »

(911Blogger) – Read the rest of this entry »

(911Speakout) – There is ample evidence, from both witnesses and recordings, of explosions associated with the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7). NIST sidestepped investigating explosions and explosives by setting up an artificially high threshold of interest. They swept aside any testimony or recordings of explosions that would not register 130-140 dB one kilometer away. They established this criterion using RDX (one of the loudest explosives) in a scenario that produced a far higher sound level than other possible uses of explosives to bring down the building. Then they turned around and used sound level as the sole criterion for deciding whether the use of explosives was a credible hypothesis. By this maneuver, they sidestepped investigating the testimony of explosives or possible evidence of explosive residues. This is just one more instance of fraudulent behavior on the part of the NIST investigation of the World Trade Center disaster. Read the rest of this entry »

(March 5, 2010) – Read the rest of this entry »

(March 5, 2010) – Read the rest of this entry »

“The Jersey Girls” support AE911Truth efforts! – Editor
(911Blogger) – We’re proud to have the endorsement of The Jersey Girls, who single handedly forced the Bush Administration to convene the 9/11 Commission after one year of inaction following the attacks of September 11 Read the rest of this entry »

The headline, “Just Say No to NIST” (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) is purposely patterned after Nancy Reagan’s “Just Say No to Drugs.” In the case of David Griffin’s new book, The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7, the NIST lies, half truths, omissions, and the outright corruption of honest science are the administration’s dope, administered by NIST, to lull inquiring minds into believing the fantasy of their lies. Read the rest of this entry »

The headline, “Just Say No to NIST” (the National Institute of Standards and Technology) is purposely patterned after Nancy Reagan’s “Just Say No to Drugs.” In the case of David Griffin’s new book, The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7, the NIST lies, half truths, omissions, and the outright corruption of honest science are the administration’s dope, administered by NIST, to lull inquiring minds into believing the fantasy of their lies. Read the rest of this entry »

Richard Gage, AIA, representing the nearly one-thousand-strong architects and engineers with AE911Truth, recently returned from another successful presentation tour – this time in colorful New England. Read the rest of this entry »

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has had considerable difficulty determining a politically correct sequence of events for the unprecedented destruction of three World Trade Center (WTC) buildings on 9/11. But despite a number of variations in NIST’s story, it never considered explosives or pyrotechnic materials in any of its hypotheses. Read the rest of this entry »

New Video footage from AE911Truth at NIST by videographer/editor Mike Shea. Richard Gage, AIA, founder of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, visits the National Institute of Standards and Technology after NIST’s lead investigator for the World Trade Center disaster. Read the rest of this entry »

First of all, I am pleased to mention that Cincinnati 9/11 Truth’s hour long TV show on cable Public Access (Media Bridges), which used to be just once a month, has quadrupled its output to once a week Read the rest of this entry »

First of all, I am pleased to mention that Cincinnati 9/11 Truth’s hour long TV show on cable Public Access (Media Bridges), which used to be just once a month, has quadrupled its output to once a week Read the rest of this entry »

A compelling interview of David Ray Griffin by George Kenney of Electric Politics is now available for downloading (or streaming) Read the rest of this entry »

San Diego – On Wednesday, October 21, 2009, former NASA engineering executive Dwain Deets, will speak on behalf of more than 900 architects and engineers who cite evidence of explosive demolition at all three World Trade Center high-rises on 9/11 and are calling for a new, independent investigation into their destruction. Read the rest of this entry »

Dear Mr. Kara
Thank you for your “Open Letter to the 9-11 Working Group of Bloomington.” As a member of that group, I’m glad to see you express interest in our work and I appreciate your invitation to further discuss the 9/11 Commission report in a public forum. It’s unfortunate that you’re not willing to engage in Q&A, however, as the questions are many and, to this day, the answers are very few. It is also unfortunate that you are not willing to debate the facts, because we would be happy to have you come to Bloomington for a public debate. But a dialogue of any sort is a welcome start. Read the rest of this entry »

We are very excited today to announce thatArchitects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth(AE911Truth.org) is now comprised of 900+ professional architects and engineers supporting the call for a new and real independent investigation. Read the rest of this entry »

We are very excited today to announce thatArchitects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth(AE911Truth.org) is now comprised of 900+ professional architects and engineers supporting the call for a new and real independent investigation. Read the rest of this entry »

July 20, 2009 – AIA General Counsel meets with Richard Gage, AIA at the headquarters of the American Institute of Architects in Washington DC. Read the rest of this entry »

(DavidRayGriffin) – At 5:21 in the afternoon of 9/11, almost seven hours after the Twin Towers had come down, Building 7 of the World Trade Center also came down. The collapse of this building was from the beginning considered a mystery. Read the rest of this entry »

So what goes into the making of a contemporary American revolutionary? What turns an ordinary law abiding, relatively sedate and insular, American Idol watching couch potato into an informed and committed citizen prepared to incur risk and make meaningful prolonged personal sacrifice aimed at reclaiming our country? Two things: truth and suffering. Read the rest of this entry »

Ignorance is bliss as it is seemingly better to not want to know. You see, if people really knew the depth of the rat hole into which we’ve descended, maybe they might have to take action or even consider putting a few cases of bottled water in the closet before the hurricane hits. But no, they don’t want to know, and if you try to warn them it will fall on deaf ears because God will save them as their faith in Jesus is all they need. Read the rest of this entry »

(RussiaToday) – Could the most audacious terrorist attack in history be a “sophisticated masterpiece of demolition”? That’s what chemistry professor Niels Harrit has been asking, following his investigation of the World Trade Centre rubble, which has revealed traces of explosives. Read the rest of this entry »

A ground-breaking scientific paper confirmed this week that red-gray flakes found throughout multiple samples of WTC dust are actually unexploded fragments of nanothermite, an exotic high-tech explosive.

Read the rest of this entry »

A ground-breaking scientific paper confirmed this week that red-gray flakes found throughout multiple samples of WTC dust are actually unexploded fragments of nanothermite, an exotic high-tech explosive.

Read the rest of this entry »

Below is the Abstract, Introduction and Conclusions of this important and carefully researched article Read the rest of this entry »

Giant flames engulf every floor of 44-story building and it remains standing, yet limited fires across just 8 floors of WTC 7 brought down building within 7 seconds on 9/11. How can NIST’s “new phenomenon” explain this one? Read the rest of this entry »

Giant flames engulf every floor of 44-story building and it remains standing, yet limited fires across just 8 floors of WTC 7 brought down building within 7 seconds on 9/11. How can NIST’s “new phenomenon” explain this one? Read the rest of this entry »

To the truthers, “building 7″ ­ the third building in the World Trade Center complex to collapse on September 11 ­ is evidence that the mainstream media is in on the plot. Read the rest of this entry »