If authenticated, document could create constitutional crisis, reaction could be martial law
California attorney Orly Taitz has released a copy of a birth certificate that purports to show Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya, which if authenticated would plunge the United States into a constitutional crisis and potentially herald a catastrophic loss of confidence in the legitimacy of the government.
The Obama birth certificate issue has been rumbling on for over a year, with researchers demanding to see a complete birth certificate proving that President Obama was born in Hawaii as he claims, yet none has been forthcoming.
Mainstream media attention on the issue has intensified over the past few weeks, even forcing the White House itself to publicly dismiss the controversy.
However, Taitz’ bombshell discovery blows the whole story wide open and its ramifications could be monumental.
According to World Net Daily, Taitz has filed a new motion in U.S. District Court seeking authentication for the document.
View the document below. Click for enlargements.
CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENT
CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENT
CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENT
“The document lists Obama’s parents as Barack Hussein Obama and Stanley Ann Obama, formerly Stanley Ann Dunham, the birth date as Aug. 4, 1961, and the hospital of birth as Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya,” reports World Net Daily.
“No doctor is listed. But the alleged certificate bears the signature of the deputy registrar of Coast Province, Joshua Simon Oduya. It was allegedly issued as a certified copy of the original in February 1964.
“WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical.”
Despite the fact that a hoax document similar in nature circulated the Internet last week, World Net Daily reports that the new document “bears none of the obvious traits of a hoax”.
The birth certificate was released by an anonymous source who did not want to be named because he fears for his life.
“I filed the motion with the court asking for expedited discovery, which would allow me to start subpoenas and depositions even before Obama and the government responds,” Taitz told WND. “I am asking the judge to give me the power to subpoena the documents from the Kenyan embassy and to require a deposition from Hillary Clinton so they will be forced to authenticate [the birth certificate].”
If proven genuine, the document could herald a constitutional crisis in the United States and lead to Barack Obama being kicked out of office before he’s even able to complete his first year in the White House.
Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution states, “No person except a natural born citizen… shall be eligible to the office of president.”
Obviously the more likely scenario will be that the court will be strong armed into dismissing the document as a counterfeit by the powers that be.
However, the overt preparations for martial law which have intensified since Obama took office have doubtless taken into account the fact that a complete loss of confidence in the legitimacy of the government could foster civil unrest and make a police state crackdown necessary from the perspective of the authorities.
Source:
dprogram.wordpress.com 
QUESTION:
What happens to Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation as Supreme Court Justice if the Constitution’s “natural born citizen” Presidential eligibility requirement is subsequently determined applicable to Barack Obama on the basis of Article 2’s exclusion of dual citizenship birth (doesn’t matter whether Obama born in Hawaii since his dad was Kenyan/British citizen at the time)? It would seem prudent, if not dereliction of Constitutional duty in not so doing, for the United States Senate to defer voting on Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation at the very least until there is determination, now imminent, on standing in Kerchner v. Congress (USDC NJ) on that precise issue (Congressional failure to take up the raised and known constitutional ineligibility question prior to declaring a Presidential winner in the vote of the electoral college). For the full Senate now to proceed to vote to confirm Judge Sotomayor (an otherwise lifetime appointment) before then, would be a knowing and very substantial exacerbation of any inherent Constitutional crisis — compounding the previous Congressional dereliction. That is, the Executive Branch, as well as conceivably all actions of a Congress under a President determined ineligible, would leave the Supreme Court as an essential unfettered remaining Branch of the Federal Government, that is unfettered so long as Mr. Obama’s nominee to the Court is not yet confirmed by the Senate.
Will not one Senator, let alone Republican Senator, raise this issue on the Senate floor? The nation is watching.
Leave a Reply
Hey idiots
A piece of 35 year old paper would turn yellow and have faded print!! Does this make too much sense for you aholes????
Hey, Bside –
I have a copy of my birth certificate that was issued in 1972 (which makes it 37 years old) that is neither yellow or suffering from faded print. Your illogical assumption is just that – an assumption.
All Mr. Obama has to do to put this entire mess to rest is release the vault copy of his Hawaiian birth certificate. The fact that he refuses to do so only adds fuel to the fire.
Or, to coin a phrase, does that make too much sense to you, asshole?
cjh
For just a moment, let’s forget about people like ‘Dr.’ Taitz. People on both sides of the issue have gone completely off the deep end over this topic. Admittedly, for some people on both sides, it was a fairly short trip.
With that out of the way…
The burden of proof does not rest upon those who doubt the claimant. The burden of proof rests solely upon the claimant. Mr. Obama has said, “I am qualified to be president.” For over a year, more than forty million American citizens* have said, “Prove it.” Mr. Obama and his supporters have said in reply, “Prove that I’m not!”
Mr. Obama, et al, have offered a simple and obvious Burden of Proof Fallacy in support of their claims and then followed it up with Appeals to Ridicule, to Popularity, to Authority and to False Dilemma/False Choice. (“Believe me or else you’re a nutjob!”) In view of the lack ofpresentation of an original document, there can only be one rational conclusion: An original document does not exist, or if it does actually exists, it contains information that disproves the assertions made by Mr. Obama, the claimant.
At the moment, there is more proof for the existence of UFO’s, remote viewing and psychic phenomena than there is for an original document of Obama’s birth certificate. ‘I saw it! It really, really exists!” or “John Doe has a picture
of a certifed copy stating that it exists, so it must be true!” is not an original document.
In view of the objective evidence – or a lack thereof – and of the possible implications, it is a very sane and rational question to ask.
Where is the – original – birth certificate?
s.
Warren “Bones” Bonesteel
Author and Researcher
Sgt USMC 1976-1983
55 Crestview Drive
Rapid City, SD 57701
(605) 348-2830
wrsteel@blackhawke.net
=====
refer:
http://www.westernjournalism.com/?page_id=2697
Clearing the Smoke on Obama’s Eligibility:
An Intelligence Investigator’s June 10 Report
=====
Natural Born Citizen defined same way seven times:
http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200804/041008c.html
Senators Introduce Resolution To Make Clear Senate’s Position On Candidate’s
Status. WASHINGTON (Thursday, April 10, 2008)
=====
http://www.expertclick.com/NewsReleaseWire/Why_Obamas_Birth_Certificate_Issue_Will_Not_Go_Away,200928023.aspx
Why Obama’s Birth Certificate Issue Will Not Go Away
Carol M. Swain
Prof: Political Science and Law
Vanderbilt University Law School
Nashville, TN
615-322-1001
July 30, 2009
=====
refer also:
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13295
Why the Founding Fathers Were “Birthers”
by JB Williams.
31 July, 2009
=====
http://tinyurl.com/ljhkrd
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmJhMzlmZWFhOTQ3YjUxMDE2YWY4ZDMzZjZlYTVmZmU=&w=MA==
Suborned in the U.S.A.
The birth-certificate controversy is about Obama’s honesty, not where he was
born.
By Andrew C. McCarthy
July 30, 2009
=====
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/obamas_birth_debate_its_about.html
Obama’s birth debate: It’s about loyalty
By James Lewis
July 31, 2009
=====
see also:
http://obamaism.blogspot.com/
=====
*
Daily Kos/Research 2000 poll. 58% of Republicans have questions about Obama’s
birth certificate or are not sure.
http://tinyurl.com/lvwa9e
http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/0709/58_of_GOP_not_suredont_beleive_Obama_born_in_US.html?showall
see also:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2008
=====
Logical Fallacies
 http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/
=====
Cognitive Biases, a list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases
=====
Jack:
Of all the Obama’s nominations–even judges–you choose Sotomayor’s? Great showing of your racist bent!
Sigh!
This whole birth certificate scam is a side issue cooked up by the Zionist faction working below Illuminati level – a power struggle by dirty tricks dept at State. Watch Biden’s and Clinton’s lips.
If world sit wasn’t so dire and out of control, we could just sit back and watch the crims tear each other to pieces.
Factions – dontya luv ’em…
all of you need to get real!!!! why do you think he came to hawaii before elections? whos the oldest hawaii senator?whos been behind fema all this time?super computor? and then all of a sudden its a 50th anniversry and hawaii birthday for obama !!!!! this is all about the same as bushs face on 911….. turn off the tv and turn on real life…….
CJH, why would Obama want to put this to rest? It’s only a small group of people who believe it, and they look crazy to the general public. Even though most Republicans don’t believe this, the entire affair is making Republicans look bad. There’s no reason any Democrat should put an end to it.